Why Export Electricity Providers Become Lost Favorite?

Liu Qiangdong went to Europe to invest in Europe, and cross-border electricity providers are in full swing.

Although many giants have shifted their focus.

However, when we talk about cross-border electricity providers, they are basically talking about imports.

Two years ago, this is not the case. At that time, the gathering of Lanting Pavilion has not yet been listed. Many export electric providers have been financed, and there are many discussions on the issue of export electricity providers.

In the past two years, both export electricity providers and import electricity providers have maintained a relatively high growth rate, so the development and potential of import and export business is not a problem in itself.

According to the Alibaba

Disclosure, established in 2010, as soon as 9 months in December 31, 2012, Alibaba International

The scale was 264 million yuan, while the same period in 2013 was 653 million yuan (about 105 million dollars), an increase of 147.3%.

Under normal circumstances, the proportion of pactions commissions through Alipay (Alipay) is 5% of the total paction volume (GMV).

From the scale of business, the total volume of pactions generated by fast selling through the whole year is 11 billion 300 million yuan.

The export electricity supplier has changed from the chased object to the lost pet. The reason is simply that one of the largest cross-border electricity export providers in China, which has already been listed in the United States, is a very strong Lanting Pavilion.

According to the earnings report, Lanting Pavilion's revenue in 2014 was 382 million dollars, and its gross profit margin was 36.6%.

The market value of Lanting Pavilion is 248 million US dollars, which is far from the capital market treatment of vip.com and so on.

Related links:

According to Yonhap news agency, the Ministry of finance of Korea announced in May 17th that it will release a comprehensive foreign investment policy in June to reduce the trade surplus of US $100 billion a year, cope with the export contraction caused by the appreciation of the Korean won, and to maximize the return on foreign investment in response to low domestic interest rates.

The South Korean government will take the lead in studying overseas investment tax system and foreign exchange management reform to amend the relevant foreign exchange system, especially the pfer tax and dividend income tax which are higher than those in Korea, and the unreasonable provisions of income tax included in the financial income tax base.

To promote overseas mergers and acquisitions, enterprises and national pension funds will be considered as mutual funds to expand public sector participation in overseas investment channels.

The above policy is expected to cause second external investment climaxes.

Reported that the South Korean government in 2007 introduced a package of foreign investment promotion plan, but because Korean enterprises over the purchase of exchange rate hedging products, did not receive the expected effect of adjusting the exchange rate, only increased short-term foreign debt.